MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: Multi-threaded mudding (was a flamefest)
At 07:45 PM 5/1/97 PST8PDT, you wrote:
><By request, a x-post of mine from rgma >
>I believe whether you use OS-supplied threading or your
>application simulates threading makes no difference.
Well, no classification differebnce. A very real practical difference.
Systems that use OS-threading can take advantage of hardware such as
multi-processors. Applciaiton implemented threading generally can not.
>A interesting doubt crosses my mine.
>Should I be using ADA or something similar?
>
Whelpers, ColdC is an object opriented event driven semi-tjhreaded
(applciation threads) system...
JK
- Thread context:
- Comments on the DB layer,
clawrenc clawrenc#cup,hp.com, Wed 07 May 1997, 07:43 GMT
- Last sendmail test (we're up to 8.*)!,
coder coder#ibm,net, Sun 04 May 1997, 08:37 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: Multi-threaded mudding (was a flamefest),
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sat 03 May 1997, 12:57 GMT
- More sendmail tests...,
coder coder#ibm,net, Sat 03 May 1997, 12:19 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: Multi-threaded mudding (was a flamefest),
Jeff Kesselman jeffk#tenetwork,com, Fri 02 May 1997, 10:30 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]