MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages
On 16/05/97 at 11:23 PM, cg#ami-cg,graysage.edmonton.ab.ca (Chris Gray)
said:
>:> Umm, "its not that unsafe"? What is unsafe at all? And no, the fact that
>:> I can efficiently implement the language isn't necessarily part of the
>:> specification of the language, but it is certainly something that I will
>:> be concerned about just as much as the details of the language spec.
>:
>:Don't worry about it too much. If Scheme can be compiled to run about
>:as fast as C, then anything else can. :)
>Grfff! Can you please tell me what you are saying is unsafe in my setup?
>If there is a problem I want to fix it!
>Perhaps it is time to take this off the mailing list?
Please don't. I'm interested in this thread and it has a lot to do with
the design of an internal language for a MUD server (ie is on topic).
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw#null,net
----------(*) Internet: coder#ibm,net
...Honourary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages, (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Sat 17 May 1997, 06:14 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sat 17 May 1997, 13:02 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sat 17 May 1997, 13:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]