MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages
At 08:29 PM 5/20/97 PST8PDT, you wrote:
> Judging
>from the effective upstream bandwidth a friend is experiencing with
>the same company in the LA basin (where there are many subscribers to
>the net service), effective upstream bandwidth usually runs
>equivalently to a dedicated bonded ISDN pair (128Kbps).
I'm very impressed. Our supplier her is TCI and TCI Im almost positive give
at best a 28.8 equiv in our area upstream.
JK
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages, (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Jeff Kesselman jeffk#tenetwork,com, Tue 20 May 1997, 11:29 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Jeff Kesselman jeffk#tenetwork,com, Tue 20 May 1997, 11:39 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Tue 20 May 1997, 21:47 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Jeff Kesselman jeffk#tenetwork,com, Wed 21 May 1997, 12:48 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Wed 21 May 1997, 21:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]