MUD-Dev
mailing list archive

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages



In <338c1fce.16025866#relay,mnsinc.com>, on 05/23/97 
   at 09:48 AM, caliban#darklock,com (Caliban Tiresias Darklock) said:

>The problem I see in projects built using proper OOP in C++ is that
>the same data is validated over... and over... and over... and
>over... because none of the objects can make any assumptions about
>the others, so they can't ever take for granted that someone else has
>validated the data. If they did, they'd break the whole reuse thing. 

Actually that's what I've been doing with stratight C and procedural
programming for years.  I've always been a big fan of heavy sanity
checking.  Then OOP came along and made it de rigeuer.

-- 
J C Lawrence                           Internet: claw#null,net
(Contractor)                           Internet: coder#ibm,net
---------------(*)               Internet: clawrenc#cup,hp.com
...Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...




[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]