MUD-Dev
mailing list archive

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [MUD-Dev] Levels and Goals [was Alright..IF your gonan do



At 07:20 PM 6/3/97 PST8PDT, jclawrence wrote:
>>In order to get the kidns of numbers you need.. we look for 200+ new
>>users per day at TEN .. you can't have an entry process that is
>>either labor intensive or unscalable.
>
>Nope.  The problem is not the solution ,its the presentation.  You can
>actually keep the current process entirely intact -- what you are
>changing is the perceived process by the users.
>
>Still easy to do.  Keep the definitions as above, make approval of
>applications automatic (you can even wrap the process in fancy FX),
>and then just insert the dissapproved for the ones you don't want. 
>just as much or as little work as the current process I'd wager, with
>the associated benefit of giving you an automated system for removing
>those you don't want without your jurors having to spend any time on
>it.

I don't understand. How do you determine which you don;'t want withotu
lookign at them all?

JK





[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]