MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] New Topic: ButtheadS and Jurisprudance
In <3.0.2.32.19970815095040.0085dea0#mail,tenetwork.com>, on 08/15/97
at 10:50 AM, Jeff Kesselman <jeffk#tenetwork,com> said:
>At 05:24 PM 8/14/97 PST8PDT, JCL wrote:
>>Actually I thought one of the advantages of the system was that it
>>wasn't in the slightest democratic. (I'm not a fan of democracies or
>>democratic systems BTW) It was expressly to prevent democratic farces
>well comapred to most of teh systems I'm modeling-- autocratic or
>single ruler systems, its VERY democratic. Acutally sicen what you
>describe are failures in implementatiosn of democracies rather then
>the basic concept, Ild hesitate to say your mdoel is MORE democratic
>then the real world...
<kof>
Yup! Spoofs tend to exceed their own models that way. Thanks.
>Seems to me if you have a jury and a vote you have a democracy. Now
>aya round that... am I wrong?
Umm, sorta. Most democratic models don't encourage the voters and the
voted object to actively prey on each other, but that's more a
(significant) character difference than a principle difference.
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw#null,net
(Contractor) Internet: coder#ibm,net
---------------(*) Internet: clawrenc#cup,hp.com
...Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] New Topic: Butthead features, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]