MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] RP=MUSH/PG=MUD
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997 clawrenc#cup,hp.com wrote:
> In <Pine.GSO.3.96.970814042027.31H-100000@dryslwyn>, on 08/13/97
> at 08:41 PM, Martin Keegan <martin#cam,sri.com> said:
>
> >Well, if the effect you're trying to achieve involves loads of old
> >druid blokes crouched round a dolmen chanting their magical
> >incantataions, and the player hears their names: Drynhirth, Eltanel,
> >Griniath, Renfrwyn and Calidorn, you don't want someone (*) renaming
> >them Knknkqqkl, Samfox, Dagon, and Azazoth, as this destroys the
> >consistency of the world.
>
> Why does this destroy internal consistancy? The renames are private
> to the characters that assign them. Thus while Bubba may do the name
> assignments you see above, and would then see those names about the
> dolmen, Boffo would still continue to see the same old original names
> as he as *not* assigned new names.
<concession>
Yeah, Ok. You and JeffK have convinced me that you might not be wrong.
</concession>
> Note also that I don't give NPC's names. They may state that they
Ah. The reason we disagree here is that we're designing fundamentally
different muds. If you've got a mud with NPCs playing historical
characters, you probably don't want someone renaming Adolf Hitler to
'Boopsie'.
> >(*) does anyone know who Knknkqqkl *was*, BTW ;)?
>
> <ponder>
>
> It rings bells for one of the characters in "The Far Sea".
BZZZZZZZZZZRT!
One of Alan Cox's characters on MUD1.
Kill Next Knight Next Knight Quick Quit Keep Living
Mk
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]