MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] META: Web site backgrounds and readability
> From: J C Lawrence <claw#under,engr.sgi.com>
>
> How readable are the pages on *your* system with *your* browser?
> Are they too dark? Do they make reading difficult?
Looks fine under IE 3.02 and 4.01 at 800x600, 1024x768 and 1280x1024.
It also looks good under Web Explorer at 1024x768. I found no readability
problems with the italics.
BTW, I agree with most of Caliban's comments on the right/left issue. I
would
also point out that one can fix position text/buttons on the left and also
fix their
widths if you use buttons. While buttons/text on the right side are
"floating"
depending on browser resolution, unless you hardcode specific dimensions.
But then you'll be hard coding for the lowest common denominator 640x480,
leaving a great deal of blank space on the right for anyone who exceeds
that
resolution. Still it's quite workable until you get into frames. Fixing a
navigation frame on the right in most browsers is very ugly.
--
Jon Lambert
- Thread context:
- META: Archive message format,
J C Lawrence claw#under,engr.sgi.com, Thu 16 Apr 1998, 16:28 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] There can be.. only ONE!,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Wed 15 Apr 1998, 19:46 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Personality modelling,
J C Lawrence claw#under,engr.sgi.com, Wed 15 Apr 1998, 19:39 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] META: Web site backgrounds and readability,
plateau plateau#mail,tcbi.com, Tue 14 Apr 1998, 23:56 GMT
- META: Web site backgrounds and readability,
J C Lawrence claw#under,engr.sgi.com, Tue 14 Apr 1998, 18:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]