MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: (fwd) AD: [custom graphical] whitestar Crossfire MUD
- To: mud-dev#kanga,nu
- Subject: [MUD-Dev] Re: (fwd) AD: [custom graphical] whitestar Crossfire MUD
- From: Matt Chatterley <matt#mpc,dyn.ml.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:56:49 +0000 (GMT)
- Delivery-date: Thu Apr 30 04:58:25 1998
- Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 04:58:25 -0700
- Envelope-to: claw#kanga,nu
- Reply-To: mud-dev#kanga,nu
- Sender: "Petidomo List Agent,,,," <petidomo#kanga,nu>
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 1998 14:03:48 -0500 (CDT)
> Cat <cat#bga,com> wrote:
>
> > Consider my alternative tool, Microsoft Visual C++ - which I did, in
> > fact, choose. Had I even considered the alternative of doing a
> > non-web based Java app, as Crossfire did, rather than a Windows-only
> > .exe file, I'd be looking at a simple tradeoff. The majority of my
> > potential Windows users, the ones who do not happen to already have
> > the Java runtime environment installed, would have to go through
> > extra download time, and extra setup time. Some of them would still
> > try the game anyway, others would decide it's too much hassle to
> > bother with. So I lose that number of potential users. In
> > exchange, I gain some percentage of the users of other platforms
> > that Java runs on - most (but not all) of the non-Windows-based
> > computers out there. It's a simple question of numbers. Is the
> > number gained larger than the number lost, or smaller?
>
> I should probably note up front that your choice lost me as a
> potential customer. I have only one system out of the half dozen plus
> at home that is physically capable of running Windows (Windows doesn't
> run on Alpha's, PA RISC's etc), plus the minor fact that I refuse to
> own or use any MS products of any flavour. <shrug> Then again, my
> computing habits don't fall into any of the more commercially
> desirable mass-market demographics.
True, commercially speaking, I think.. although not necessarily. There are
a *lot* of people with non-windows machines which can run Java (*example
only* - lets not drop into Java advocacy issues, please?). Amiga, Linux
(and other UNIXite systems) being the main to leap to mind. I believe the
Acorn/ARM machines can also run Java, now.. thats probably enough to
balance up the 'risk' of requiring the JRE. Of course, for a commercial
product, you could supply a suitable JRE along with a copy of the client
on disk or cd.
As to which number would be larger (assuming download-only distribution)..
who can tell? This list isn't a particularly good survey form, since I
think we are largely non-windows based? I do know that a commercial
release over multi-platforms could play up on this fact advertising wise,
to reach a greater audience.. Hmm. Interesting.
[Snip rest]
--
Regards,
-Matt Chatterley
"You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.." -John Lennon (Imagine)
--
MUD-Dev: Advancing an unrealised future.
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] OT: CGDC, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: (fwd) AD: [custom graphical] whitestar Crossfire MUD,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 26 Apr 1998, 16:00 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: (fwd) AD: [custom graphical] whitestar Crossfire MUD,
Jay Sax cimri1#gte,net, Thu 30 Apr 1998, 01:43 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: (fwd) AD: [custom graphical] whitestar Crossfire MUD,
Koster, Raph rkoster#origin,ea.com, Mon 04 May 1998, 07:53 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]