MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions
On Tue, 5 May 1998, Felix A. Croes wrote:
> Jon A. Lambert <jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com> wrote:
> >[...]
> > Trivia note: My terminology "spin-lock" comes from IBM's MVS/ESA
> > architecture. MVS uses spin-locking in its page locking scheme
> > to implement shared memory.
I was under the impression that a spinlock (from Posix threads/parallel
processing terminology) was a mutex which was locked by repeatedly trying
to grab the mutex for a short period of time (useful only on parallel
processing machines where grabbing a new processor outweighs the extra
CPU cycles expended on the old one).
Jo
--
MUD-Dev: Advancing an unrealised future.
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions,
Felix A. Croes felix#xs1,simplex.nl, Mon 04 May 1998, 17:25 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions,
Felix A. Croes felix#xs1,simplex.nl, Tue 05 May 1998, 06:25 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions,
Felix A. Croes felix#xs1,simplex.nl, Wed 06 May 1998, 19:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]