On Tue, 5 May 1998, Adam Wiggins wrote: > Hrm - perhaps everything between ANY set of braces should be considered > a function? ^ clarification: it should have said 'atomic' right here. Adam -- MUD-Dev: Advancing an unrealised future.
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 03 May 1998, 17:16 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Sun 03 May 1998, 15:19 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Shawn Halpenny malachai#iname,com, Tue 05 May 1998, 14:32 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Adam Wiggins adam#angel,com, Tue 05 May 1998, 19:18 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Adam Wiggins adam#angel,com, Tue 05 May 1998, 19:33 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Shawn Halpenny malachai#iname,com, Thu 07 May 1998, 14:09 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, J C Lawrence claw#under,engr.sgi.com, Wed 13 May 1998, 18:23 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Wed 13 May 1998, 22:14 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: atomic functions, Felix A. Croes felix#xs1,simplex.nl, Sun 03 May 1998, 17:45 GMT