MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Protocols
Hello,
Today's flame bite:
Have anyone considered using HTTP-ng architecture in general, MUX in
particular?
Excerpt:
> Current TCP implementations do not share congestion information across
> multiple simultaneous connections between two peers, which increases
> the overhead of opening new TCP connections. We expect that
> Transactional TCP and sharing of congestion information in TCP control
> blocks will improve TCP performance by using less RTTs, making it more
> suitable for HTTP transactions.
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/MUX/
--
Still alive and smile stays on,
Vadim Tkachenko <vt#freehold,crocodile.org>
--
UNIX _is_ user friendly, he's just very picky about who his friends are
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Black Isle's Baldur's Gate,
J C Lawrence claw#under,engr.sgi.com, Sat 08 Aug 1998, 01:56 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Object Storage Fact Book, Release 4.0 (fwd),
Nathan F Yospe yospe#hawaii,edu, Fri 07 Aug 1998, 23:20 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] after the plague: mud report,
S. Patrick Gallaty choke#sirius,com, Fri 07 Aug 1998, 19:03 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Events,
s001gmu s001gmu#nova,wright.edu, Fri 07 Aug 1998, 15:59 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Protocols,
Vadim Tkachenko vt#freehold,crocodile.org, Fri 07 Aug 1998, 04:53 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question regarding Java threads,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Thu 06 Aug 1998, 04:03 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]