MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: lurker emerges
>>>>> "Alex" == T Alexander Popiel <popiel#snugharbor,com> writes:
Alex> You seem to assume that it is impossible for a single thread to keep
Alex> even one I/O device continuously busy. Whatever happened to double-
Alex> buffering and non-blocking I/O? Has that art actually been lost in
Alex> the annals of time?
As far as I know O_NONBLOCK/O_NDELAY on regular files only
prevents blocking on mandatory locks. Atleast that's how I
interpret Solaris's manual page, and my test program indicates
so too. How can double-buffering be done without non-blocking
I/O?
However you are probably right, one thread per physical device
is enough. Doubling thread count was just a guess.
Petri
[MUD-Dev] Re: lurker emerges,
Petri Virkkula pvirkkul#iki,fi, Mon 10 Aug 1998, 05:57 GMT
[MUD-Dev] Re: lurker emerges,
James Wilson jwilson#rochester,rr.com, Sun 09 Aug 1998, 23:54 GMT
[MUD-Dev] Re: lurker emerges,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Mon 10 Aug 1998, 02:18 GMT
[MUD-Dev] Re: lurker emerges,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Mon 10 Aug 1998, 05:28 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]