MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet progra
On 25 Aug 98, Adam J. Thornton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 1998 at 06:03:05PM -0700, Caliban Tiresias Darklock
> wrote:
> > "Doctor, it hurts when I do this..." Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't
> > stray pointers something you shouldn't have in the first place? Every
> > argument I've heard for W9x being a bad platform comes down to "If you
> > screw up, bad things happen". Well, call me arrogant, but I say just don't
> > screw up.
>
> I'm not smart enough to write real programs without screwing up.
> And I like it when my mistakes don't make me have to reboot, and I
> just get "Segmentation Violation [core dumped]", and then I can
> debug using the core file and my executable, and realize that I
> passed in the value stored at some place rather than its address, or
> something like that.
Nod. I also screw up often and I get the exact same error, except
a dialog box pops up that says a "A page-fault exception has occurred
at 0x0cfe004e in kernel32.exe". Then I click the just-in-time
debugging button and my source window, assembly pane and call stack
window pop up. Double-click on the last function called on the
stack and usually the offending source line is staring me in the
face. Ah, but I simplify, I usually try to code more devious and
subtle pointer errors. ;)
> And with a modular, extensible framework, where you can't
> necessarily control the quality of the code being run, well, I'd be
> really wary of running it in an environment that didn't rigorously
> enforce process isolation.
Well... I'm not inclined to venture into debugging the libs or dlls
supplied with my OS or compiler. I don't have access to the source
code nor do I have the time to fix their code. I'd rather send the
vendor some hate E-mail and demand they supply a workaround or fix
for the problem.
--
--/*\ Jon A. Lambert - TychoMUD Internet:jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com /*\--
--/*\ Mud Server Developer's Page <http://www.netcom.com/~jlsysinc> /*\--
--/*\ "Everything that deceives may be said to enchant" - Plato /*\--
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet programming ...], (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet programming ...],
Caliban Tiresias Darklock caliban#darklock,com, Wed 26 Aug 1998, 12:51 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet programming ...],
Caliban Tiresias Darklock caliban#darklock,com, Wed 26 Aug 1998, 12:58 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet programming ...],
pomales pomales#caip,rutgers.edu, Wed 26 Aug 1998, 13:11 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Scripting:was Modular Mud,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Thu 27 Aug 1998, 05:37 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet progra,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Wed 26 Aug 1998, 04:32 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet programming ...],
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai asmodai#wxs,nl, Sun 30 Aug 1998, 14:57 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet programming ...],
James Wilson jwilson#rochester,rr.com, Sun 30 Aug 1998, 18:40 GMT
[MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD [Was:Finer points of Telnet progra,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Wed 26 Aug 1998, 03:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]