MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: Intermud Communication...is it worth it?
In message: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980902212739.15853A-100000#shamen,cyberhighway.net>
Ben Greear <greear#cyberhighway,net> writes:
>
>A fellow was talking with me about coding up an inter-mud
>tell/gossip/mail type of thing... I know it's been done
>before, and finally found where (www.imaginary.com).
There's also the rpage protocol that was used by Tiny* stuff
(but has been largely abandoned in favor of multi-mudding);
talk to Lydia Leong about getting the code (lwl#digex,net).
Also, there's the MUDnet bots; for info on those, contact
Zenty (zenty#usa,net), sTiLe (stile#mindless,com), Bobby
(bobby#socalled,com), or hellspawn (tdragond#heads,mit.edu),
or mail omni#mux,net.
>But, before I go and hack another shack onto the ghetto
>that is my code, I'd like to hear opinions on either the
>existing protocols, or the idea in general...
InterMUD-3 (the stuff at imaginary.com) does not support
multi-target messages effectively, and this is one of the
most-requested extensions.
rpage is effectively dead.
MudNet is actively used, but I know next to nothing about it.
On the feature as a whole, the idea is cute, but I prefer to
just log in to multiple MUDs at once.
- Alex
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Intermud Communication...is it worth it?,
Ben Greear greear#cyberhighway,net, Thu 03 Sep 1998, 04:36 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] VT-100 and other terminal data,
J C Lawrence claw#under,engr.sgi.com, Wed 02 Sep 1998, 19:14 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Admin: OS wars and avocacy are off-topic,
J C Lawrence claw#kanga,nu, Sun 30 Aug 1998, 21:26 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: lockless system - foolproof?,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 30 Aug 1998, 16:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]