MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?
Author: mud-dev#kanga,nu ("Koster, Raph" <rkoster#origin,ea.com>)
Date: 9/23/98 3:05 PM
Raph wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ryan Prince [mailto:jynx_ryn#mindless,com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 7:16 PM
>> To: mud-dev#kanga,nu
>> Subject: [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?
>>
>>Persistant refers to something which is at least INTEDED
>>to keep the effects that are placed on it for the rest
>>of it's life, until something else changes it back.
>>Diablo looses here because it is not persistant, it is
>>meant to be reset often. MUDs on the other hand are only
>>reset when a major addition is being tested or added or
>>it crashed.
>
>Many of the early muds in fact reset the entire world,
>because they were based around the concept of a scavenger
>hunt. You tried to gather as many of the hunt items as
>you could, and drop them in a central location to score
>points. You can still see remnants of this design in
>AberMUDs and their descendants, including the ubiquitous
>town squares in Diku-derivatives... so in fact many of
>the early muds were not really very persistent.
For another Aber-derivative: In the LP world persistence
is mostly an illusion - it's common for the entire world
to be reset every 30 minutes. The illusion is that it's
done slowly, one object at a time, so as to appear like
it's not happening at all.
With each definition of what is *not* a mud I see more and
more games that most certainly *are* muds that fall into
the "not mud" category, or barely escape it. A
conventional definition of what a mud is from a few years
ago would have included "text based" and "free" in the
text. Raph would certainly take offense if told that UOL
was not a mud. I wouldn't blame him.
I know a few people whose definition of "mud" doesn't
include the Tiny family. "Glorified Chat" is what I've
heard it called. The same definition precludes non-game
muds, like one I know that acts as a support group for
cancer victims, one mentioned here occasionally that is
devoted to astronomy, and one a friend works for whose
purpose is to provide an educational environment for people
not able to attend normal classes.
I know this isn't the answer we want to hear, but perhaps
Diablo *is* a mud. A limited one, certainly, but a mud
nonetheless.
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Jo Dillon emily#thelonious,new.ox.ac.uk, Wed 23 Sep 1998, 15:35 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Ryan Prince jynx_ryn#mindless,com, Thu 24 Sep 1998, 05:42 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Koster, Raph rkoster#origin,ea.com, Wed 23 Sep 1998, 15:21 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Michael.Willey Michael.Willey#abnamro,com, Wed 23 Sep 1998, 18:44 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Koster, Raph rkoster#origin,ea.com, Thu 24 Sep 1998, 14:35 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Kylotan kylotan#globalnet,co.uk, Sat 26 Sep 1998, 01:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]