MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: META: who are we?
In message: <199809222232.QAA07645#darklock,com>
Caliban Tiresias Darklock <caliban#darklock,com> writes:
>
>I think there ought to be some sort of implied agreement on a list that if
>you think system X sucks, you keep it to yourself when people discuss the
>proper implementation of system X.
I strongly agree. When I'm posting such questions, I'm usually
already firmly convinced that X sucks, and don't need more people
telling me so. I need an answer to the question, not the metaquestion
(which has already been resolved). If I want input on the metaquestion
as well, then I'll clearly state so in my query.
- Alex
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Hal Black hal#moos,ml.org, Wed 23 Sep 1998, 04:33 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?,
Jon A. Lambert jlsysinc#ix,netcom.com, Thu 24 Sep 1998, 05:23 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] META: who are we?,
Koster, Raph rkoster#origin,ea.com, Tue 22 Sep 1998, 21:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]