MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: PDMud thread summary
On Sat, 24 Oct 1998, ApplePiMan#aol,com wrote:
>At 10/23/98 9:02 PM James Wilson (jwilson#rochester,rr.com) altered the
>fabric of reality by uttering:
>
>>Then of course you'd have to choose what sort of gc you want. copying?
>>compacting? mark-and-sweep? generational? train? different people would
>>probably want radically different things (for some it may not be an issue).
>
>Not an issue to me... but probably mostly because I haven't the vaguest
>idea what you're talking about. <g> Could you perhaps point those of us
>ignorant of such matters to a good resource for learning about the
>various gc schemes?
see <url:ftp://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/garbage/bigsurv.ps> for one
survey. Or try
<url:http://www.cs.ukc.ac.uk/people/staff/rej/gcbib/gcbibW.html>.
I have difficulty imagining a system in which the choice of gc algorithm
is up to each module, which would seem to imply that gc would have to go
in the core with threading and dynamic loading.
James
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: PDMud thread summary, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: PDMud thread summary,
ApplePiMan ApplePiMan#aol,com, Sat 24 Oct 1998, 02:58 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: PDMud thread summary,
ApplePiMan ApplePiMan#aol,com, Sat 24 Oct 1998, 23:29 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: PDMud thread summary,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 25 Oct 1998, 17:28 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]