MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: openmud: open issues
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Vadim Tkachenko wrote:
>James Wilson wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to set down the design issues that have come up, in short pithy blurbs.
>> Please add to this list:
[note that I was looking more for issues than answers. that said - ]
>> 8. memory management: garbage collection? explicit allocation/deallocation?
>
>At least some kind of smart pointer with a mark-n-sweep or reference
>counter, the latter is better in the languages like C++ where it's
>possible to have static/automatic objects behave as their dynamic
>counterparts (explanation will follow if there's enough demand; I had a
>very stable implementation working exactly the same for MS-DOS, Windows
>and OS/2, only Java prevented it from existing in UNIX incarnation)
reference counting? how do you reclaim cycles?
James
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: OpenMUD: bus-based communications,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 25 Oct 1998, 16:03 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] openmud: open issues,
James Wilson jwilson#rochester,rr.com, Sun 25 Oct 1998, 14:37 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] openmud or pdmud or devmud,
James Wilson jwilson#rochester,rr.com, Sun 25 Oct 1998, 14:16 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]