MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Jon A. Lambert wrote:
[context switching]
> Yes, but I can't for the life of me figure out why it's so damn important
> to avoid. ;)
> Here's a common example:
[snip]
> Is there context switching going on here? YES! Loads and loads of the
> "expensive" process-level context switching.
From what I've picked up, the data/instruction cache(s) of a processor
would have to be cleared out, for process context switches, but for thread
context switches, I see your point.
Although, as someone said, making it fast tends to be a good idea anyway;
not caring about resources is how we got Windows :)
--
_ __ __ __
/_) / / (_ (__
/\ /_/ __) /
______________/
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server., (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.,
Mik Clarke mikclrk#ibm,net, Tue 18 May 1999, 07:01 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.,
Jo Dillon emily#thelonious,new.ox.ac.uk, Tue 18 May 1999, 07:02 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.,
Ross Nicoll rnicoll#lostics,demon.co.uk, Fri 28 May 1999, 21:03 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.,
Ola Fosheim Grøstad olag#ifi,uio.no, Wed 19 May 1999, 04:46 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.,
David Bennett ddt#discworld,imaginary.com, Mon 17 May 1999, 04:42 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]