Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.

[Ross Nicoll <rnicoll#lostics,demon.co.uk>]

Just re-read my reply to this message, sorry, shouldn't have gone out in
that state. The last piece was meant to be a prompt for more
information...
-- 
  _   __  __  __
 /_) / / (_  (__
/\  /_/  __)   /
______________/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 20:03:19 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ross Nicoll <rnicoll#lostics,demon.co.uk>
To: mud-dev#kanga,nu
Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.

On Sun, 30 May 1999, Jon A. Lambert wrote:

[snip]
> > Although, as someone said, making it fast tends to be a good idea anyway;
> > not caring about resources is how we got Windows :)
> I think the NT group has a pretty good bead on multi-threading 
> performance.  Win32 threads is a cheetah compared to many PThreads 
> implementations.
Oh? I'm kinda suprised...



_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist  -  MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev