MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages (slightly offtopic, was Text Parsing)
Travis S. Casey wrote:
>
[snip]
> How can "get the red box" be misunderstood, unless there is more than one
> red box in the area? Or "put the red sword in the box on the table"?
> (Again, unless there's more than one sword, or more than one box on the
> table, or more than one table that has a box on it.)
>
[snip]
Point for the ambiguity argument - Does "put the red sword in the box on
the
table" mean put the red sword you are holding/carrying in the box on the
table or put the red sword that is in the box onto the table?
Jp Calderone
--
A sad spectacle. If they be inhabited, what a scope for misery and
folly.
If they be not inhabited, what a waste of space.
-- Thomas Carlyle, looking at the stars
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages (slightly offtopic, was Text Parsing), (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages (slightly offtopic, was Text Parsing),
Matthew Mihaly diablo#best,com, Wed 02 Jun 1999, 22:23 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages (slightly offtopic, was Text Parsing),
Jp Calderone exarkun#flashmail,com, Wed 02 Jun 1999, 23:23 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages (slightly offtopic, was Text Parsing),
Greg Miller gmiller#classic-games,com, Wed 02 Jun 1999, 23:25 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Text Parsing,
Katrina McClelan kitkat#marcus,pants.nu, Wed 02 Jun 1999, 14:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]