MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] memory and speed
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 18:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Adam Wiggins <adam#angel,com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Matthew Mihaly wrote:
>> We tripled our memory today, from 128 megs to 384 megs, but we
>> seem to actually have slowed down. In fact, adding more memory
>> has definitely slowed us down. Some tasks are taking nearly twice
>> as long as before. This is extremely upsetting, to say the
>> least. Anyone have any ideas?
> Doh!
> Something is definitely not right.
I haven't verified this, but I faintly recall rumours of certain
chipsets on certain motherboards having this sort of behaviour. I'd
recommend searching the Linux-kernel archives on Mail Archive
(http://www.mail-archive.com/).
--
J C Lawrence Home: claw#kanga,nu
---------(*) Linux/IA64 - Work: claw#varesearch,com
... Beware of cromagnons wearing chewing gum and palm pilots ...
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] thoughts on game economies, (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Games within Games,
Jesse Farinacci jesse#twcny,rr.com, Fri 11 Jun 1999, 15:25 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] memory and speed,
Matthew Mihaly diablo#best,com, Fri 11 Jun 1999, 00:56 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] memory and speed,
Adam Wiggins adam#angel,com, Fri 11 Jun 1999, 01:35 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] memory and speed,
J C Lawrence claw#varesearch,com, Fri 11 Jun 1999, 03:01 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] memory and speed,
Caliban Tiresias Darklock caliban#darklock,com, Fri 11 Jun 1999, 04:35 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]