MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Battle Systems
Matthew Mihaly wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Ben Greear wrote:
>
> > Philip Loguinov -- Draymoor wrote:
> > >
> > > Basicly, get rid of the auto attack function in a battle.
> > > If two players initiate combat, then don't do anything, nothing will happen.
> > > They will dance arround each other and thats it.
> >
> > What I see here, from a player's perspective, is a lot of boring typeing,
> > after the first rush wears off. They will find the best combination in
> > short order, and exploit it repettively, with a MACRO most likely.
>
> This only results from a poorly designed system. You ever play
> speed-chess? That's what a good combat system should be like,
> fundamentally, for the sort of thing he is talking about.
I'd compare it more to Go, since it's more in line with the
moves-time-ratio you're talking about.
--
http://www.classic-games.com/
Conspiracy theorists mistakenly assume others think before acting.
*** Please limit .sigs to four lines and avoid HTML mail or posts. ***
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Battle Systems,
Ben Greear greear#cyberhighway,net, Mon 04 Oct 1999, 06:03 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Battle Systems,
Batis bat_geor#mail,hol.gr, Mon 04 Oct 1999, 18:54 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Battle Systems,
Mik Clarke mikclrk#attglobal,net, Mon 04 Oct 1999, 18:54 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Battle Systems,
Hans-Henrik Staerfeldt hhs#cbs,dtu.dk, Mon 04 Oct 1999, 18:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]