MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] patents and muds
"Sellers, Michael" wrote:
>
> But: I would not be surprised to see examples of bona fide advances in
> MMPOGs start to appear in patents.
So just be able to prove you published it first and thier patent will
be invalid (unless they cite you as prior-art). That's one of the
nice things about open source - you cannot patent something that has
been published.
Do we need a date-stamped archive for code bases?
Mik
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Pueblo, (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] The Best Guy on the Mud Thing,
Greg Miller gmiller#classic-games,com, Thu 14 Oct 1999, 18:07 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] patents and muds,
Bruce Mitchener, Jr. bruce#puremagic,com, Thu 14 Oct 1999, 18:07 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [MUD-Dev] patents and muds,
Sellers, Michael MSellers#maxis,com, Thu 14 Oct 1999, 19:24 GMT
- RE: [MUD-Dev] patents and muds,
Cynbe ru Taren cynbe#muq,org, Thu 14 Oct 1999, 21:29 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] patents and muds,
Richard Bartle 76703.3042#compuserve,com, Fri 15 Oct 1999, 17:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]