Re: [MUD-Dev] Proper liscense for MUD source? Perhaps not GPL... (fwd)

[J C Lawrence <claw#cp,net>]

On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 19:43:13 -0700 
Ben Greear <greearb#candelatech,com> wrote:

> That said, a clause equating public connection to the code with
> binary release sounds quite fair, and I'd be interested to see
> such a clause (addition to the GPL I assume?) if you write one...

Such has been suggested on license-discuss (see
http://www.opensource.org/) more than once.  The trouble is that it
violates points 5, 6, and 9 of the Open Source Definition, as well
as violating various aspects of the Gnu Manifesto and RMS'es stated
intentions for it.

-- 
J C Lawrence                              Internet: claw#kanga,nu
----------(*)                            Internet: coder#kanga,nu
...Honorary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...


_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist  -  MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev