MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] Valhalla license?
CFrancy#aol,com wrote:
>
> Do any of you have any advice to give on my situation:
> Im looking to have a codebase to use on a mud without restriction
> commercially. Valhalla (derivation of Diku , www.valhalla.com ) offers a
> business lisence for 900 dollars. Does anyone think I'd be better off buying
> Valhalla than attempting to create a codebase from scrath with 4 other
> coders?
Perhaps you could give us some information on the requirements of your
mud? It's hard to suggest a solution without knowing the problem.
In short (as another poster already mentioned) it's probably better to
use Valhalla, unless you've something very specific in mind. However
that really is an over-generalised answer.
KaVir.
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] Planet/Solar System Generation, (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Valhalla license?,
CFrancy CFrancy#aol,com, Tue 18 Jan 2000, 08:10 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Mud-Dev FAQ part II,
Marian Griffith gryphon#iaehv,nl, Sun 16 Jan 2000, 18:59 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Mud-Dev FAQ part I,
Marian Griffith gryphon#iaehv,nl, Sun 16 Jan 2000, 18:59 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Databases,
T. Alexander Popiel popiel#wolfskeep,com, Sun 16 Jan 2000, 18:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]